Champion sheet · ADC

Ezreal

Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · NA

Tournament presence · pick + ban

21.6%#23 of 173 champions

Pick: 14.2%picked in 406 of 2,850 games
Ban: 7.4%154 bans over 2,078 games, against 3.3% in soloQ

Win rate as ADC51.1% between 47.0% and 55.2% over 401 gamesSoloQ 46.1%: clear gap

Median length29.9 minsoloQ 28.1 min

Amateur: 2,886 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, NA. SoloQ Master+: 241,611 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.

What changes in tournaments4 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as ADC.Win rateDraftLength
How to play itLethal Tempo, then Trinity Force, Manamune, and Endless Hunger: the most played build in soloQ.
In a compTeam damage first: more damage than 96% of ADC.DamagePoke
With / againstNo opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.
In draftPriority pick: taken in G1, burned afterwards.

01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

4 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as ADC.

Win rateWins more in amateur play
Amateur
51.1%
SoloQ
46.1%
51.1% win rate in amateur play over 401 games, against 46.1% in soloQ over 24,512 games.
DraftPicked more often in amateur play
Amateur
7.1%
SoloQ
4.8%
7.1% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 4.8% in soloQ.
DraftBanned more often in amateur play
Amateur
7.5%
SoloQ
3.3%
7.5% ban rate in amateur play over 1,538 games, against 3.3% in soloQ over 108,274 games.
LengthLonger games in amateur play
Amateur
29.9 min
SoloQ
28.1 min
Median of 29.9 min in amateur play, against 28.1 min in soloQ.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Lethal Tempo, then Trinity Force, Manamune, and Endless Hunger: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block

RunesLethal Tempo88% · 21,613

Same in amateur play

SpellsFlash + Barrier76% · 18,551

Same in amateur play

SkillsQnot collected in soloQ

Amateur: 100% · 88 games

Core (3 legendaries)38% · 5,453

38%of soloQ games

Trinity Force
Manamune
Endless Hunger

Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Team damage first: more damage than 96% of ADC.

Team damagetop4%28% · ADC: 23%

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other ADC

What marks it

Damage
Poke

Like other ADC

Gold at 15 min
Gold at 20 min
Absorbs damage
Plays teamfights
Takes its kills in duels
Lets allies carry kills

What it is not

Little CC

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 81 in lane, 81 in mid game and 88 in late game, out of 100 ADC.

585+60 vs 525

1,041+126 vs 915

1,611+245 vs 1,366

Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30

EzrealADC

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, ahead of 57% of ADC against the direct opponent.

ADC

Where it stands among ADC · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100

Damage in lane · rank 81 of 100 among ADC585 · median 525
Damage in mid game · rank 81 of 100 among ADC1,041 · median 915
Damage in late game · rank 88 of 100 among ADC1,611 · median 1,366
Gold at 15 min · rank 64 of 100 among ADC+23 · median -54
Gold at 20 min · rank 57 of 100 among ADC-48 · median -85
Absorbs damage · rank 60 of 100 among ADC390 · median 361
Plays teamfights · rank 38 of 100 among ADC55% · median 56%
Takes its kills in duels · rank 62 of 100 among ADC19% · median 19%
Lets allies carry kills · rank 51 of 100 among ADCrank 51 of 100
Crowd control (CC) · rank 11 of 100 among ADC0.1 · median 0.6
Team damage · rank 96 of 100 among ADC28% · median 23%

04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

Jarvan IV56.4% · expected 53.6% · 39 g+2.8 ptSoloQ +2.8

Xin Zhao53.3% · expected 52.9% · 30 g+0.5 ptSoloQ +0.1

Midgap to expected

Orianna60.0% · expected 54.8% · 40 g+5.2 ptSoloQ +3.9

Viktor50.0% · expected 49.4% · 38 g+0.6 ptSoloQ -0.2

ADCgap to expected

Ashe48.9% · expected 46.3% · 45 g+2.5 ptSoloQ -0.5

Supportgap to expected

Karma64.5% · expected 57.7% · 31 g+6.8 ptSoloQ -0.7

Lulu54.3% · expected 53.6% · 46 g+0.8 ptSoloQ +0.2

With

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

Jarvan IV54.8% · expected 48.7% · 31 g+6.2 ptSoloQ -1.3

Midgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Supportgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by

Top17 champions