Champion sheet · ADC

Sivir

Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · KR

Tournament presence · pick + ban

10.3%#81 of 173 champions

Pick: 7.2%picked in 1,302 of 18,069 games
Ban: 3.1%527 bans over 17,135 games, against 1.7% in soloQ

Win rate as ADC50.2% between 47.9% and 52.4% over 1,300 gamesSoloQ 49.9%: no clear gap

Median length29.5 minsoloQ 26.6 min

Amateur: 18,182 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR. SoloQ Master+: 337,103 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.

What changes in tournaments4 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as ADC.DraftLengthBuild
How to play itLethal Tempo, then Yun Tal Wildarrows, Navori Flickerblade, and Infinity Edge: the most played build in soloQ.
In a compPlays teamfights first: more teamfights than 98% of ADC.TeamfightPoke
With / againstBetter than expected against Dr. Mundo in amateur play: +16.2 pts over 44 games, range above zero.+16.2 pt44 games
In draftFallback pick: comes out late in the series, once the pool has emptied.

01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

4 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as ADC.

DraftPicked more often in amateur play
Amateur
3.4%
SoloQ
1.5%
3.4% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 1.5% in soloQ.
DraftBanned more often in amateur play
Amateur
2.8%
SoloQ
1.7%
2.8% ban rate in amateur play over 11,141 games, against 1.7% in soloQ over 144,722 games.
LengthLonger games in amateur play
Amateur
29.5 min
SoloQ
26.6 min
Median of 29.5 min in amateur play, against 26.6 min in soloQ.
BuildEssence Reaver, Navori Flickerblade, Infinity Edge instead of Yun Tal Wildarrows, Navori Flickerblade, Infinity Edge
Amateur
30%
SoloQ
30%
Played in 30% of amateur games; soloQ sticks to Yun Tal Wildarrows, Navori Flickerblade, Infinity Edge (30%).

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Lethal Tempo, then Yun Tal Wildarrows, Navori Flickerblade, and Infinity Edge: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block

RunesLethal Tempo97% · 10,398

Same in amateur play

SpellsFlash + Barrier59% · 6,281

Same in amateur play

SkillsQnot collected in soloQ

Amateur: 96% · 209 games

Core (3 legendaries)30% · 1,710

30%of soloQ games

Yun Tal Wildarrows
Navori Flickerblade
Infinity Edge

≠ Amateur: Essence Reaver, Navori Flickerblade, Infinity Edge instead of Yun Tal Wildarrows, Navori Flickerblade, Infinity Edge. 30% · 1,152 games

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Plays teamfights first: more teamfights than 98% of ADC.

Plays teamfightstop2%61% · ADC: 56%

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other ADC

What marks it

Teamfight
Poke

Like other ADC

Damage in late game
Gold at 15 min
Gold at 20 min
Absorbs damage
Lets allies carry kills
Team damage

What it is not

Few duels
Little CC

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 16 in lane, 21 in mid game and 65 in late game, out of 100 ADC.

478-47 vs 525

854-61 vs 915

1,412+46 vs 1,366

Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30

SivirADC

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 51% of ADC against the direct opponent.

ADC

Where it stands among ADC · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100

Damage in lane · rank 16 of 100 among ADC478 · median 525
Damage in mid game · rank 21 of 100 among ADC854 · median 915
Damage in late game · rank 65 of 100 among ADC1,412 · median 1,366
Gold at 15 min · rank 44 of 100 among ADC-79 · median -54
Gold at 20 min · rank 49 of 100 among ADC-87 · median -85
Absorbs damage · rank 53 of 100 among ADC362 · median 361
Plays teamfights · rank 98 of 100 among ADC61% · median 56%
Takes its kills in duels · rank 4 of 100 among ADC12% · median 19%
Lets allies carry kills · rank 59 of 100 among ADCrank 59 of 100
Crowd control (CC) · rank 2 of 100 among ADC0.1 · median 0.6
Team damage · rank 71 of 100 among ADC25% · median 23%

04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against Dr. Mundo in amateur play: +16.2 pts over 44 games, range above zero.

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

Dr. Mundo68.2% · expected 52.0% · 44 g+16.2 ptSoloQ -0.4

Gnar60.9% · expected 51.1% · 46 g+9.7 ptSoloQ +0.9

Jayce63.3% · expected 51.7% · 30 g+11.6 ptSoloQ -1.3

Zaahen55.9% · expected 48.6% · 34 g+7.3 ptSoloQ -6.8

Ornn53.1% · expected 48.3% · 49 g+4.8 ptSoloQ -1.5

Junglegap to expected

Qiyana65.7% · expected 51.4% · 35 g+14.3 ptSoloQ +1.9

Vi52.5% · expected 49.9% · 122 g+2.6 ptSoloQ +2.0

Xin Zhao52.6% · expected 49.7% · 57 g+2.9 ptSoloQ -0.8

Midgap to expected

Twisted Fate61.5% · expected 48.6% · 39 g+12.9 ptSoloQ +0.7

Sylas60.8% · expected 52.1% · 51 g+8.6 ptSoloQ +1.3

Zed53.3% · expected 43.5% · 30 g+9.8 ptSoloQ +3.6

Ahri50.0% · expected 47.2% · 102 g+2.8 ptSoloQ -0.7

Lissandra57.4% · expected 52.1% · 47 g+5.3 ptSoloQ +2.0

ADCgap to expected

Ezreal59.2% · expected 54.6% · 142 g+4.6 ptSoloQ +1.8

Varus58.5% · expected 50.0% · 53 g+8.5 ptSoloQ -5.8

Jhin56.7% · expected 54.4% · 90 g+2.3 ptSoloQ +1.1

Miss Fortune52.9% · expected 49.9% · 51 g+3.1 ptSoloQ -3.1

Caitlyn48.7% · expected 48.0% · 76 g+0.7 ptSoloQ -0.8

Supportgap to expected

Karma63.8% · expected 52.2% · 47 g+11.6 ptSoloQ -1.3

Thresh56.8% · expected 48.5% · 74 g+8.2 ptSoloQ -0.7

Nautilus56.0% · expected 51.4% · 134 g+4.5 ptSoloQ +3.7

Blitzcrank56.7% · expected 49.6% · 60 g+7.1 ptSoloQ +2.2

Leona54.1% · expected 49.5% · 98 g+4.5 ptSoloQ +0.9

With

Topgap to expected

Ornn64.8% · expected 52.0% · 54 g+12.8 ptSoloQ -6.2

Dr. Mundo58.1% · expected 48.3% · 31 g+9.8 ptSoloQ -4.2

Olaf57.4% · expected 51.7% · 54 g+5.7 ptSoloQ -2.5

Renekton55.3% · expected 50.5% · 47 g+4.8 ptSoloQ +5.8

Nasus56.5% · expected 51.6% · 46 g+4.9 ptSoloQ -0.4

Junglegap to expected

Lee Sin55.0% · expected 48.9% · 149 g+6.2 ptSoloQ +0.3

Lillia61.7% · expected 53.0% · 47 g+8.7 ptSoloQ +2.0

Naafiri60.6% · expected 50.9% · 33 g+9.7 ptSoloQ +0.4

Vi53.9% · expected 50.4% · 89 g+3.5 ptSoloQ +4.4

Sylas51.1% · expected 50.8% · 88 g+0.3 ptSoloQ +1.7

Midgap to expected

Xerath64.7% · expected 51.6% · 34 g+13.1 ptSoloQ +0.2

Yone64.9% · expected 53.5% · 37 g+11.4 ptSoloQ +1.9

Lissandra56.5% · expected 48.2% · 62 g+8.3 ptSoloQ -5.3

Aurora58.1% · expected 49.2% · 43 g+8.9 ptSoloQ 0.0

Viktor52.0% · expected 50.5% · 98 g+1.6 ptSoloQ +3.4

Supportgap to expected

Leona57.8% · expected 50.8% · 90 g+7.0 ptSoloQ +0.9

Lulu52.7% · expected 47.9% · 129 g+4.8 ptSoloQ +0.1

Braum59.2% · expected 52.7% · 76 g+6.5 ptSoloQ +2.2

Nautilus52.2% · expected 48.9% · 115 g+3.3 ptSoloQ +0.8

Karma54.3% · expected 48.1% · 46 g+6.2 ptSoloQ +2.8

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by

Top24 champions