Champion sheet · Mid
Nasus
Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · KRTournament presence · pick + ban
20.0%#29 of 173 champions
- Pick
- 8.0%picked in 1,461 of 18,319 games
- Ban
- 12.0%2,091 bans over 17,354 games, against 6.6% in soloQ
Win rate as Mid55.0% between 49.8% and 60.1% over 249 gamesSoloQ 47.2%: clear gap
Median length28.8 minsoloQ 25.5 min
Amateur: 18,182 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR. SoloQ Master+: 341,014 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.
At a glance
Four answers, each one opens its chapter.- What changes in tournaments3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.Win rateDraftLength
- How to play itFleet Footwork, then Trinity Force, Frozen Heart, and Spirit Visage: the most played build in soloQ.
- In a compAbsorbs damage first: absorbs more than 97% of mid laners.FrontlineLets allies carrySplit-push
- With / againstNo opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.
- In draftTaken at any point of the series.
What changes in tournaments?
3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.
- Win rateWins more in amateur play
- Amateur
- 55.0%
- SoloQ
- 47.2%
- DraftBanned more often in amateur play
- Amateur
- 9.0%
- SoloQ
- 6.6%
- LengthLonger games in amateur play
- Amateur
- 28.8 min
- SoloQ
- 25.5 min
How to play it?
Fleet Footwork, then Trinity Force, Frozen Heart, and Spirit Visage: the most played build in soloQ.
RunesFleet Footwork70% · 2,549Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Ghost43% · 1,585Same in amateur play
SkillsQnot collected in soloQAmateur: 100% · 60 games
Core (3 legendaries)13% · 132
13%of soloQ games
- Trinity Force
- Frozen Heart
- Spirit Visage
Amateur: Trinity Force, Spirit Visage, Frozen Heart (24%), gap not settled
Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.
What does it bring to a comp?
Absorbs damage first: absorbs more than 97% of mid laners.
- Absorbs damagetop3%1,491 · mid laners: 489
- Lets allies carry killstop10%rank 90 of 100
Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other mid laners
What marks it
- Frontline
- Lets allies carry
- Split-push
Like other mid laners
- Damage in mid game
- Damage in late game
- Gold at 20 min
- Plays teamfights
- Takes its kills in duels
- Crowd control (CC)
- Team damage
What it is not
- Little map pressure
- No poke
Damage / min by phase · at equal gold
Rank 13 in lane, 63 in mid game and 60 in late game, out of 100 mid laners.
473-55 vs 528
942+43 vs 899
1,210+32 vs 1,179
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Nasusmid laners
Gold vs. direct opponent
At 20 min, ahead of 50% of mid laners against the direct opponent.
mid laners
2.9takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; mid laners: 3.2.
Where it stands among mid laners · every measure
0 ← less · median · more → 100- Damage in lane · rank 13 of 100 among mid laners473 · median 528
- Damage in mid game · rank 63 of 100 among mid laners942 · median 899
- Damage in late game · rank 60 of 100 among mid laners1,210 · median 1,179
- Gold at 15 min · rank 21 of 100 among mid laners-220 · median +25
- Gold at 20 min · rank 50 of 100 among mid laners+62 · median +71
- Map pressure · rank 21 of 100 among mid laners2.9 · median 3.2
- Absorbs damage · rank 97 of 100 among mid laners1,491 · median 489
- Plays teamfights · rank 51 of 100 among mid laners55% · median 55%
- Takes its kills in duels · rank 71 of 100 among mid laners26% · median 23%
- Lets allies carry kills · rank 90 of 100 among mid lanersrank 90 of 100
- Crowd control (CC) · rank 41 of 100 among mid laners0.6 · median 0.7
- Team damage · rank 44 of 100 among mid laners20% · median 21%
With whom, against whom?
No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.
in
Best results
Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.
Against
Topgap to expected
No positive gap in amateur play.
Junglegap to expected
No positive gap in amateur play.
Midgap to expected
No positive gap in amateur play.
ADCgap to expected
No positive gap in amateur play.
Supportgap to expected
Nautilus58.8% · expected 56.6% · 34 g+2.2 ptSoloQ +3.6
Matchups and allies
One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.
Sort by
Top17 champions
- Renekton13 games—SoloQ: 63.9% · 61 g
- Garen12 games—SoloQ: 51.7% · 118 g
- K'Sante12 games—SoloQ: 43.0% · 179 g
- Mordekaiser12 games—SoloQ: 38.0% · 50 g
- Aatrox11 games—SoloQ: 47.4% · 171 g
- Ambessa11 games—SoloQ: 47.3% · 112 g
- Dr. Mundo10 games—SoloQ: 39.0% · 41 g
- Gnar10 games—SoloQ: 50.0% · 58 g
- Olaf10 games—SoloQ: 47.4% · 154 g
- Sion10 games—SoloQ: 58.8% · 51 g
- Zaahen10 games—SoloQ: 49.0% · 49 g
- Camille8 games—SoloQ: 44.2% · 95 g
- Jax8 games—SoloQ: 45.9% · 122 g
- Yone7 games—SoloQ: 50.8% · 183 g
- Gragas6 games—SoloQ: 55.8% · 43 g
- Darius5 games—SoloQ: 48.2% · 85 g
- Jayce5 games—SoloQ: 45.5% · 132 g
Jungle15 champions
- Lee Sin25 games—SoloQ: 49.4% · 425 g
- Wukong22 games—SoloQ: 45.5% · 77 g
- Jarvan IV19 games—SoloQ: 43.9% · 98 g
- Nocturne15 games—SoloQ: 48.1% · 52 g
- Sylas14 games—SoloQ: 44.9% · 167 g
- Vi11 games—SoloQ: 43.8% · 89 g
- Viego11 games—SoloQ: 54.3% · 129 g
- Lillia10 games—SoloQ: 39.8% · 103 g
- Xin Zhao9 games—SoloQ: 55.9% · 68 g
- Graves7 games—SoloQ: 52.6% · 154 g
- Qiyana7 games—SoloQ: 52.8% · 216 g
- Cho'Gath6 games—SoloQ: 49.2% · 63 g
- Gwen5 games—SoloQ: — · 7 g
- Jayce5 games—SoloQ: 41.2% · 68 g
- Kayn5 games—SoloQ: 42.6% · 47 g
Mid19 champions
- Viktor15 games—SoloQ: 51.7% · 242 g
- Galio14 games—SoloQ: 51.5% · 163 g
- Yone10 games—SoloQ: 50.0% · 134 g
- Ahri9 games—SoloQ: 54.7% · 95 g
- Orianna9 games—SoloQ: 53.2% · 79 g
- Sylas9 games—SoloQ: 53.3% · 120 g
- Akali8 games—SoloQ: 40.0% · 95 g
- Ryze8 games—SoloQ: 39.7% · 63 g
- Syndra8 games—SoloQ: 50.0% · 110 g
- Galio7 games—SoloQ: 51.5% · 163 g
- Hwei7 games—SoloQ: 41.8% · 79 g
- Lissandra7 games—SoloQ: 48.6% · 74 g
- Malzahar7 games—SoloQ: 48.1% · 54 g
- Mel7 games—SoloQ: — · 14 g
- Twisted Fate7 games—SoloQ: 40.1% · 192 g
- LeBlanc5 games—SoloQ: 34.1% · 85 g
- Locke5 games—SoloQ: 44.5% · 110 g
- Yasuo5 games—SoloQ: 47.4% · 171 g
- Zed5 games—SoloQ: 47.5% · 179 g
ADC15 champions
- Jhin26 games—SoloQ: 46.0% · 396 g
- Caitlyn22 games—SoloQ: 42.8% · 208 g
- Ezreal21 games—SoloQ: 52.3% · 239 g
- Yunara19 games—SoloQ: 47.1% · 365 g
- Kai'Sa18 games—SoloQ: 51.6% · 426 g
- Jinx15 games—SoloQ: 42.1% · 252 g
- Ashe14 games—SoloQ: 48.3% · 60 g
- Sivir14 games—SoloQ: 50.0% · 56 g
- Miss Fortune12 games—SoloQ: 46.8% · 77 g
- Aphelios9 games—SoloQ: 50.8% · 238 g
- Lucian9 games—SoloQ: 54.2% · 155 g
- Xayah9 games—SoloQ: 43.5% · 115 g
- Zeri7 games—SoloQ: 43.1% · 160 g
- Tristana6 games—SoloQ: 50.3% · 189 g
- Draven5 games—SoloQ: 41.4% · 58 g
Support16 champions
- Nautilus34 games58.8%gap +2.2 ptsSoloQ: 51.5% · 274 g
- Lulu22 games—SoloQ: 48.1% · 295 g
- Leona18 games—SoloQ: 41.5% · 135 g
- Braum17 games—SoloQ: 41.6% · 113 g
- Seraphine17 games—SoloQ: 59.3% · 81 g
- Blitzcrank11 games—SoloQ: 43.9% · 180 g
- Poppy10 games—SoloQ: 44.0% · 50 g
- Rell10 games—SoloQ: 48.6% · 146 g
- Alistar9 games—SoloQ: 46.2% · 158 g
- Karma9 games—SoloQ: 50.3% · 151 g
- Bard8 games—SoloQ: 42.8% · 145 g
- Milio8 games—SoloQ: 56.3% · 80 g
- Rakan8 games—SoloQ: 43.0% · 107 g
- Thresh8 games—SoloQ: 39.3% · 313 g
- Yuumi6 games—SoloQ: 55.6% · 117 g
- Pyke5 games—SoloQ: 41.5% · 82 g
Ban it or pick it?
Taken at any point of the series.
Pick rate as Mid
Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ- SoloQ Master+0.5%3,598 picks of 682,027ban 6.6% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
- Amateur tournaments0.5%112 picks of 24,310ban 9.0% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
- Pro0.1%3 picks of 2,238bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20
Presence by patch
8.1% on 16.2116.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.
