Tournament presence · pick + ban
16.9%#42 of 173 champions
Pick
6.4%picked in 1,778 of 27,920 games
Ban
10.5%2,391 bans over 22,713 games, against 10.6% in soloQ
Win rate as Top50.9% between 48.7% and 53.1% over 1,436 gamesSoloQ 49.9%: no clear gap
Median length28.7 minsoloQ 27 min

Amateur: 27,970 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR 65% · EUW 25% · NA 10%. SoloQ Master+: 951,671 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Top.

  • DraftPicked more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    1.9%
    SoloQ
    1.7%
    1.9% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 1.7% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned less often in amateur play
    Amateur
    7.8%
    SoloQ
    10.6%
    7.8% ban rate in amateur play over 14,779 games, against 10.6% in soloQ over 419,060 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    28.7 min
    SoloQ
    27 min
    Median of 28.7 min in amateur play, against 27 min in soloQ.
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Fleet Footwork, then Trinity Force, Frozen Heart, and Spirit Visage: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesFleet Footwork74% · 25,007
Same in amateur play
SpellsGhost + Teleport40% · 13,531
Same in amateur play
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 98% · 124 games
Core (3 legendaries)21% · 2,366
21%of soloQ games
  1. Trinity Force
  2. Frozen Heart
  3. Spirit Visage
Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Absorbs damage first: absorbs more than 94% of top laners.

  1. Absorbs damagetop7%1,565 · top laners: 970

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other top laners

What marks it

  • Frontline
  • Split-push

Like other top laners

  • Gold at 20 min
  • Plays teamfights
  • Takes its kills in duels
  • Lets allies carry kills
  • Crowd control (CC)
  • Team damage

What it is not

  • No poke

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 15 in lane, 91 in mid game and 77 in late game, out of 100 top laners.

537-62 vs 599
978+110 vs 868
1,171+92 vs 1,079
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Nasustop laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 73% of top laners against the direct opponent.

top laners

Where it stands among top laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 15 of 100 among top laners537 · median 599
  • Damage in mid game · rank 91 of 100 among top laners978 · median 868
  • Damage in late game · rank 77 of 100 among top laners1,171 · median 1,079
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 16 of 100 among top laners-404 · median +119
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 28 of 100 among top laners-177 · median +100
  • Absorbs damage · rank 94 of 100 among top laners1,565 · median 970
  • Plays teamfights · rank 57 of 100 among top laners54% · median 53%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 55 of 100 among top laners29% · median 28%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 72 of 100 among top lanersrank 72 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 40 of 100 among top laners0.7 · median 0.8
  • Team damage · rank 59 of 100 among top laners22% · median 20%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against Braum in amateur play: +11.9 pts over 92 games, range above zero.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected
Olaf61.2% · expected 47.9% · 49 g+13.4 ptSoloQ +1.2
Mordekaiser58.5% · expected 49.9% · 41 g+8.6 ptSoloQ -0.6
Malphite51.7% · expected 51.3% · 120 g+0.4 ptSoloQ +4.9
Dr. Mundo55.9% · expected 53.9% · 68 g+2.0 ptSoloQ +3.2
K'Sante56.0% · expected 53.0% · 50 g+3.0 ptSoloQ -2.7
Junglegap to expected
Lillia57.1% · expected 47.4% · 42 g+9.7 ptSoloQ 0.0
Lee Sin55.0% · expected 51.2% · 151 g+3.8 ptSoloQ -0.2
Naafiri61.3% · expected 49.9% · 31 g+11.4 ptSoloQ +0.9
Wukong54.0% · expected 48.5% · 87 g+5.5 ptSoloQ -2.3
Cho'Gath54.1% · expected 49.5% · 37 g+4.6 ptSoloQ +0.2
Midgap to expected
Vex64.1% · expected 51.5% · 39 g+12.6 ptSoloQ -0.3
Akali59.6% · expected 50.7% · 52 g+8.9 ptSoloQ -1.0
Aurora61.5% · expected 51.8% · 39 g+9.7 ptSoloQ +0.8
Sylas54.1% · expected 51.1% · 85 g+3.0 ptSoloQ -1.2
Locke58.8% · expected 51.3% · 34 g+7.6 ptSoloQ -0.2
ADCgap to expected
Tristana63.8% · expected 50.9% · 58 g+12.9 ptSoloQ -0.2
Jhin57.0% · expected 53.3% · 79 g+3.7 ptSoloQ -2.8
Yunara49.7% · expected 48.8% · 159 g+0.9 ptSoloQ -0.8
Caitlyn50.0% · expected 49.1% · 108 g+0.9 ptSoloQ +1.0
Lucian53.4% · expected 51.7% · 88 g+1.7 ptSoloQ -0.8
Supportgap to expected
Braum60.9% · expected 48.9% · 92 g+11.9 ptSoloQ -2.1
Neeko61.8% · expected 49.2% · 34 g+12.6 ptSoloQ +2.6
Karma62.5% · expected 53.5% · 48 g+9.0 ptSoloQ +1.3
Seraphine55.6% · expected 49.9% · 81 g+5.7 ptSoloQ -1.6
Rakan56.1% · expected 50.0% · 57 g+6.1 ptSoloQ -2.6

With

Junglegap to expected
Sejuani65.9% · expected 48.6% · 41 g+17.3 ptSoloQ -0.2
Jayce56.8% · expected 49.0% · 37 g+7.7 ptSoloQ +1.7
Vi54.3% · expected 51.2% · 81 g+3.1 ptSoloQ +3.3
Lillia57.9% · expected 54.4% · 38 g+3.5 ptSoloQ +0.7
Midgap to expected
Yone64.5% · expected 53.7% · 31 g+10.8 ptSoloQ 0.0
Syndra56.5% · expected 51.6% · 92 g+4.9 ptSoloQ +1.6
Viktor55.7% · expected 51.4% · 97 g+4.3 ptSoloQ -2.2
LeBlanc57.1% · expected 51.3% · 42 g+5.8 ptSoloQ +1.8
Cassiopeia60.0% · expected 53.2% · 35 g+6.8 ptSoloQ -1.1
ADCgap to expected
Caitlyn62.7% · expected 52.7% · 118 g+10.0 ptSoloQ -0.3
Lucian59.5% · expected 50.1% · 84 g+9.5 ptSoloQ -0.2
Sivir58.9% · expected 49.7% · 56 g+9.2 ptSoloQ +3.4
Kai'Sa54.6% · expected 50.5% · 108 g+4.2 ptSoloQ -1.1
Aphelios55.1% · expected 47.1% · 49 g+8.0 ptSoloQ +2.0
Supportgap to expected
Milio57.4% · expected 49.0% · 68 g+8.4 ptSoloQ -2.0
Nautilus56.3% · expected 51.1% · 144 g+5.1 ptSoloQ -1.2
Alistar60.0% · expected 52.0% · 65 g+8.0 ptSoloQ +0.4
Lulu50.4% · expected 48.4% · 133 g+2.0 ptSoloQ +0.5
Braum55.3% · expected 52.9% · 94 g+2.4 ptSoloQ -1.7

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top24 champions
  • Malphite120 games
    51.7%gap +0.4 ptsSoloQ: 53.7% · 1,348 g
  • Ornn79 games
    44.3%gap -6.2 ptsSoloQ: 50.1% · 751 g
  • Sion73 games
    45.2%gap -6.2 ptsSoloQ: 46.8% · 549 g
  • Dr. Mundo68 games
    55.9%gap +2.0 ptsSoloQ: 54.3% · 753 g
  • Garen63 games
    52.4%gap -1.2 ptsSoloQ: 46.6% · 1,250 g
Jungle21 champions
  • Lee Sin151 games
    55.0%gap +3.8 ptsSoloQ: 50.1% · 2,440 g
  • Jarvan IV108 games
    48.1%gap -4.2 ptsSoloQ: 49.3% · 1,170 g
  • Sylas90 games
    38.9%gap -11.0 ptsSoloQ: 49.6% · 1,289 g
  • Wukong87 games
    54.0%gap +5.5 ptsSoloQ: 46.8% · 1,155 g
  • Vi86 games
    46.5%gap -4.1 ptsSoloQ: 50.8% · 708 g
Mid22 champions
  • Ahri87 games
    49.4%gap +0.6 ptsSoloQ: 50.0% · 1,464 g
  • Sylas85 games
    54.1%gap +3.0 ptsSoloQ: 50.2% · 1,292 g
  • Syndra80 games
    45.0%gap -5.2 ptsSoloQ: 49.2% · 1,507 g
  • Viktor80 games
    50.0%gap -0.4 ptsSoloQ: 50.8% · 1,559 g
  • Orianna66 games
    50.0%gap -3.1 ptsSoloQ: 54.3% · 644 g
ADC17 champions
  • Yunara159 games
    49.7%gap +0.9 ptsSoloQ: 48.9% · 2,708 g
  • Kai'Sa118 games
    46.6%gap -4.7 ptsSoloQ: 53.6% · 2,921 g
  • Caitlyn108 games
    50.0%gap +0.9 ptsSoloQ: 52.2% · 1,794 g
  • Jinx96 games
    42.7%gap -6.3 ptsSoloQ: 47.7% · 2,317 g
  • Ezreal93 games
    53.8%gap -0.4 ptsSoloQ: 55.2% · 1,911 g
Support19 champions
  • Nautilus134 games
    45.5%gap -5.2 ptsSoloQ: 50.4% · 2,019 g
  • Lulu133 games
    50.4%gap -3.1 ptsSoloQ: 49.2% · 2,463 g
  • Milio97 games
    52.6%gap -0.2 ptsSoloQ: 54.0% · 928 g
  • Leona93 games
    50.5%gap -1.5 ptsSoloQ: 46.6% · 1,283 g
  • Braum92 games
    60.9%gap +11.9 ptsSoloQ: 46.0% · 1,069 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Taken at any point of the series.

Pick rate as Top

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+1.7%31,943 picks of 1,903,323ban 10.6% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments1.9%710 picks of 38,304ban 7.8% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro0.6%13 picks of 2,238bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

8.3% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Top
  • 4.4%G1309 games of 7,074
  • 4.4%G2311 games of 7,080
  • 5.2%G3+145 games of 2,815
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 309 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.