Tournament presence · pick + ban
13.2%#62 of 173 champions
Pick
6.7%picked in 1,856 of 27,821 games
Ban
6.5%1,473 bans over 22,617 games, against 0.7% in soloQ
Win rate as Top47.5% between 45.4% and 49.7% over 1,467 gamesSoloQ 51.2%: clear gap
Median length28.9 minsoloQ 27.5 min

Amateur: 27,970 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR 65% · EUW 25% · NA 10%. SoloQ Master+: 951,671 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

5 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Top.

  • Win rateWins less in amateur play
    Amateur
    47.5%
    SoloQ
    51.2%
    47.5% win rate in amateur play over 1,467 games, against 51.2% in soloQ over 36,783 games.
  • DraftPicked more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    2.7%
    SoloQ
    1.8%
    2.7% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 1.8% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    6.2%
    SoloQ
    0.7%
    6.2% ban rate in amateur play over 14,779 games, against 0.7% in soloQ over 419,060 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    28.9 min
    SoloQ
    27.5 min
    Median of 28.9 min in amateur play, against 27.5 min in soloQ.
  • SpellsFlash + Teleport instead of Flash + Ignite
    Amateur
    70%
    SoloQ
    56%
    Played in 70% of amateur games; soloQ sticks to Flash + Ignite (56%).
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Grasp of the Undying, then Titanic Hydra, Dusk and Dawn, and Randuin's Omen: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesGrasp of the Undying97% · 35,803
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Ignite56% · 20,544
≠ Amateur: Flash + Teleport instead of Flash + Ignite. 70% · 1,641 games
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 100% · 252 games
Core (3 legendaries)14% · 1,094
14%of soloQ games
  1. Titanic Hydra
  2. Dusk and Dawn
  3. Randuin's Omen
Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Plays teamfights first: more teamfights than 91% of top laners.

  1. Plays teamfightstop9%58% · top laners: 53%
  2. Absorbs damagetop16%1,327 · top laners: 970

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other top laners

What marks it

  • Frontline
  • Teamfight

Like other top laners

  • Damage in mid game
  • Damage in late game
  • Lets allies carry kills
  • Crowd control (CC)

What it is not

  • Few duels
  • Little damage
  • No poke
  • No split-push

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 24 in lane, 38 in mid game and 27 in late game, out of 100 top laners.

553-46 vs 599
841-27 vs 868
992-88 vs 1,079
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Shentop laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 99% of top laners against the direct opponent.

top laners

Where it stands among top laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 24 of 100 among top laners553 · median 599
  • Damage in mid game · rank 38 of 100 among top laners841 · median 868
  • Damage in late game · rank 27 of 100 among top laners992 · median 1,079
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 1 of 100 among top laners-1,012 · median +119
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 1 of 100 among top laners-1,410 · median +100
  • Absorbs damage · rank 84 of 100 among top laners1,327 · median 970
  • Plays teamfights · rank 91 of 100 among top laners58% · median 53%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 1 of 100 among top laners17% · median 28%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 71 of 100 among top lanersrank 71 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 72 of 100 among top laners1.1 · median 0.8
  • Team damage · rank 17 of 100 among top laners17% · median 20%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against Malphite in amateur play: +27.0 pts over 40 games, range above zero.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected
Malphite75.0% · expected 48.0% · 40 g+27.0 ptSoloQ +3.8
Gnar55.8% · expected 49.0% · 43 g+6.8 ptSoloQ -2.6
Renekton50.0% · expected 46.0% · 52 g+4.0 ptSoloQ +0.9
Jax52.5% · expected 46.9% · 40 g+5.6 ptSoloQ +5.0
Sion50.0% · expected 48.0% · 68 g+2.0 ptSoloQ +2.5
Junglegap to expected
Lee Sin54.8% · expected 47.8% · 104 g+7.0 ptSoloQ -1.6
Sylas52.6% · expected 46.5% · 78 g+6.1 ptSoloQ +1.3
Nocturne56.9% · expected 49.8% · 51 g+7.1 ptSoloQ +1.0
Wukong45.3% · expected 45.1% · 137 g+0.1 ptSoloQ +0.8
Skarner54.5% · expected 49.9% · 33 g+4.6 ptSoloQ -3.3
Midgap to expected
Yone60.0% · expected 44.8% · 55 g+15.2 ptSoloQ +2.6
Twisted Fate62.5% · expected 46.1% · 32 g+16.4 ptSoloQ +0.5
Ryze60.5% · expected 49.1% · 43 g+11.4 ptSoloQ -0.2
Cassiopeia54.5% · expected 45.3% · 33 g+9.2 ptSoloQ +1.6
Locke53.1% · expected 47.9% · 49 g+5.1 ptSoloQ +2.4
ADCgap to expected
Lucian70.3% · expected 48.3% · 74 g+22.0 ptSoloQ -1.3
Kai'Sa58.2% · expected 48.0% · 98 g+10.2 ptSoloQ +2.9
Jhin57.1% · expected 49.9% · 112 g+7.3 ptSoloQ 0.0
Zeri53.2% · expected 44.6% · 47 g+8.6 ptSoloQ -0.4
Ezreal54.6% · expected 50.7% · 97 g+3.9 ptSoloQ +1.3
Supportgap to expected
Milio61.5% · expected 49.4% · 65 g+12.1 ptSoloQ -0.2
Nautilus54.3% · expected 47.3% · 140 g+7.0 ptSoloQ +1.1
Pyke58.3% · expected 48.1% · 36 g+10.3 ptSoloQ -1.1
Alistar51.7% · expected 46.4% · 60 g+5.3 ptSoloQ +0.3
Seraphine48.9% · expected 46.5% · 94 g+2.5 ptSoloQ -1.0

With

Junglegap to expected
Xin Zhao53.8% · expected 47.4% · 65 g+6.4 ptSoloQ -4.3
Nocturne50.0% · expected 45.3% · 70 g+4.7 ptSoloQ +0.9
Wukong50.7% · expected 49.9% · 152 g+0.7 ptSoloQ -1.2
Jarvan IV46.4% · expected 46.0% · 125 g+0.4 ptSoloQ +1.0
Viego50.0% · expected 46.6% · 52 g+3.4 ptSoloQ +1.8
Midgap to expected
Aurora56.3% · expected 46.6% · 48 g+9.6 ptSoloQ +2.0
Lissandra54.9% · expected 46.1% · 51 g+8.8 ptSoloQ -1.0
Galio58.1% · expected 46.6% · 31 g+11.5 ptSoloQ -2.1
Viktor50.0% · expected 48.0% · 140 g+2.0 ptSoloQ -1.2
Orianna48.8% · expected 45.4% · 86 g+3.5 ptSoloQ -2.0
ADCgap to expected
Ezreal54.3% · expected 44.3% · 81 g+10.0 ptSoloQ -2.3
Aphelios55.2% · expected 43.8% · 58 g+11.4 ptSoloQ +0.4
Jhin51.2% · expected 45.2% · 82 g+6.1 ptSoloQ 0.0
Miss Fortune56.1% · expected 46.8% · 41 g+9.3 ptSoloQ -1.1
Caitlyn50.8% · expected 49.4% · 132 g+1.3 ptSoloQ -0.3
Supportgap to expected
Blitzcrank63.3% · expected 49.2% · 60 g+14.2 ptSoloQ -0.1
Braum55.7% · expected 49.5% · 106 g+6.2 ptSoloQ -0.5
Bard61.0% · expected 50.4% · 41 g+10.6 ptSoloQ +1.4
Nautilus49.4% · expected 47.7% · 154 g+1.6 ptSoloQ +1.2
Rakan52.2% · expected 48.3% · 69 g+3.8 ptSoloQ -0.2

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top23 champions
  • Ornn97 games
    42.3%gap -4.8 ptsSoloQ: 52.2% · 920 g
  • Ambessa75 games
    48.0%gap +1.0 ptsSoloQ: 55.8% · 1,001 g
  • Mordekaiser72 games
    41.7%gap -4.7 ptsSoloQ: 50.6% · 1,009 g
  • Sion68 games
    50.0%gap +2.0 ptsSoloQ: 54.3% · 635 g
  • K'Sante67 games
    46.3%gap -3.4 ptsSoloQ: 52.5% · 969 g
Jungle20 champions
  • Wukong137 games
    45.3%gap +0.1 ptsSoloQ: 51.1% · 1,334 g
  • Jarvan IV117 games
    43.6%gap -5.4 ptsSoloQ: 53.2% · 1,295 g
  • Vi106 games
    45.3%gap -2.0 ptsSoloQ: 55.1% · 751 g
  • Lee Sin104 games
    54.8%gap +7.0 ptsSoloQ: 49.9% · 2,367 g
  • Sylas78 games
    52.6%gap +6.1 ptsSoloQ: 52.2% · 1,315 g
Mid20 champions
  • Ahri116 games
    37.1%gap -8.4 ptsSoloQ: 51.2% · 1,850 g
  • Viktor111 games
    42.3%gap -4.7 ptsSoloQ: 51.9% · 1,631 g
  • Syndra108 games
    45.4%gap -1.4 ptsSoloQ: 50.0% · 1,712 g
  • Sylas74 games
    48.6%gap +1.0 ptsSoloQ: 52.3% · 1,343 g
  • Orianna66 games
    53.0%gap +3.4 ptsSoloQ: 50.6% · 767 g
ADC18 champions
  • Yunara143 games
    42.7%gap -2.7 ptsSoloQ: 50.0% · 2,861 g
  • Caitlyn117 games
    40.2%gap -5.4 ptsSoloQ: 53.1% · 1,874 g
  • Jhin112 games
    57.1%gap +7.3 ptsSoloQ: 51.6% · 3,357 g
  • Jinx107 games
    37.4%gap -8.4 ptsSoloQ: 48.7% · 2,459 g
  • Kai'Sa98 games
    58.2%gap +10.2 ptsSoloQ: 54.6% · 2,961 g
Support18 champions
  • Nautilus140 games
    54.3%gap +7.0 ptsSoloQ: 53.1% · 2,075 g
  • Lulu139 games
    48.9%gap -1.1 ptsSoloQ: 51.2% · 2,583 g
  • Leona98 games
    42.9%gap -5.8 ptsSoloQ: 50.7% · 1,481 g
  • Braum95 games
    45.3%gap -0.3 ptsSoloQ: 51.8% · 1,159 g
  • Seraphine94 games
    48.9%gap +2.5 ptsSoloQ: 51.0% · 927 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Taken at any point of the series.

Pick rate as Top

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+1.8%35,090 picks of 1,903,323ban 0.7% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments2.7%1,017 picks of 38,304ban 6.2% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro0.9%21 picks of 2,238bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

12.8% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Top
  • 5.1%G1363 games of 7,056
  • 5.5%G2385 games of 7,057
  • 5.5%G3+155 games of 2,809
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 363 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.